Recently on air, Peter Doocy, a White House correspondent, shared his thoughts while temporarily stepping in as a co-host. He didn’t shy away from expressing his views on President Biden’s mental health, particularly criticizing how some media colleagues might have brushed over serious concerns regarding Biden’s cognitive condition, which allegedly has been declining even before his presidency began in 2020.
This conversation was ignited by an eye-opening article from the Wall Street Journal. The piece, which collected insights from over 50 individuals, suggested not only that Biden’s mental acuity has been questionable since before his presidency, but that there’s been an intense effort among staff and associates to mask the truth about his condition during his time in office.
The Mediaite-highlighted report featured statements from several Democratic insiders—political aides, lawmakers, and financial backers—who have long expressed concerns over Biden’s cognitive state and age-related issues. These insiders apparently enforced strict protocols regarding who could engage with Biden, what topics could be broached, and the information he could view.
One of the report’s most surprising allegations was that meetings were frequently postponed on days Biden seemed to be having difficulties, and direct interactions with him were curbed.
Doocy, visibly astonished by these revelations, portrayed Biden’s perceived inability to lead effectively as potentially “the biggest cover-up in Washington, D.C., since Watergate.” He found the media’s lack of curiosity about these allegations incomprehensible.
Doocy commented during a segment on Saturday, “There’s a major story linked closely with happenings in the White House press briefing room. Yesterday, not a single question was asked about this major Wall Street Journal piece that involved 50 sources and might represent the most significant cover-up in Washington since Watergate.”
He elaborated further, “The story stretched to 18 pages when printed, but in order for it to take place, White House staff members, unelected, were aware during the last presidential campaign and transition that President Biden’s cognitive abilities might have been on the decline, yet chose to hide this from the American people.”
He continued, “The consequences on decision-making remain uncertain, but this is a massive story, and yet there appears to be a lack of inquiry. Our colleague, Jacqui Heinrich, was present in the briefing room but was overlooked during questioning. And sources say these points were part of her intended questions.”
Moreover, another controversial topic surrounding Biden is connected to his handling of federal death sentences. Biden faces criticism for commuting virtually all of the death sentences of the 40 federal inmates awaiting execution, actions which would prevent these executions even if President-elect Trump had assumed office.
A commentator, Joey Mannarino, voiced his strong feelings on a social media platform, stating, “Joe Biden just commuted the sentence of an individual involved in the violent murder of a 12-year-old girl and her mother. He shot the girl four times in the head, almost decapitated her, and left her body in a remote area,” providing a tough critique of Biden.
Of the 40 inmates on federal death row, the President has altered the sentences for 37 men, converting them to life sentences without parole, as noted by DeathPenaltyInfo.org.
The trio not included in this action are Robert Bowers, responsible for the 2018 synagogue attack that killed 11; Dylann Roof, a white supremacist who murdered nine Black churchgoers in Charleston in 2015; and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing perpetrator who caused numerous deaths and injuries.
The men whose punishments Biden has commuted have been convicted of grave crimes, including the killing of one or more individuals. Victims of these 37 men include law enforcement personnel, children, and fellow inmates, as reported by Fox News.
